free virtual currency Featured

Even if there is still some money, which one do you add in the face of so many positions? If you are really given a chance to increase your position by a big drop, you can't achieve the purpose of spreading the cost at all with what little money you have left. Don't say it doesn't make sense to reduce the cost of the whole account, even for the stock you added, it doesn't help much.If you want to control the smoothness of the overall account, the position can be appropriately small, such as a medium position, and some funds can be reserved for better opportunities. In this way, you can attack and defend. You expect to go up, but you are not afraid of going down, because you are still a potential buyer, and you can do it more easily.In the early stage of investment, few but fine are passive and need your control. Although you don't know what's right yet, you already know what's wrong, so it will be hard to control your behavior with willpower, which is certain and insurmountable.

In the early stage of investment, few but fine are passive and need your control. Although you don't know what's right yet, you already know what's wrong, so it will be hard to control your behavior with willpower, which is certain and insurmountable.The logic of profiteering is less but better.

The logic of profiteering is less but better.Some people will ask, how much is less? Personally, if your capital does not exceed 1 million and you hold up to 5 or 6 stocks at the same time, that's enough. Even if you average the score, each stock will have nearly 200,000 funds, and 20% of the positions will be enough, regardless of the profit value of a single stock or the contribution to the portfolio.If you are wrong, because your position is small and the loss of a single stock is relatively small, it is easy for you to cut your meat, because you don't feel bad, but if many stocks cut their meat like this, it will be a lot of money, and it will be a big loss.